Quantcast
Channel: Sam Woolfe
Viewing all 160 articles
Browse latest View live

DMT Inspired Art by SalviaDroid

$
0
0
Kyle Sawyer (aka SalviaDroid) is a visionary digital artist who portrays his psychedelic experiences in impressive detail. His name is inspired by the naturally occurring hallucinogen Salvia divinorum (sage of the diviners), a plant that induces visions when ingested or smoked. His early work is inspired by his experiences with this plant, but his more recent art is inspired by DMT and captures many elements of this compound’s distinct nature.


Don't Let the Pursuit of Experiences Turn Into a Status Game

$
0
0


A strong case can be made for prioritising ‘experientialism’ over materialism; that is, looking for contentment in experiences, rather than material things. Psychological research shows that pursuing experiences over things makes us happier. Materialism has been linked to personality disorders such as narcissism, social anxiety and generally being dissatisfied with life.

Taking some time out to travel might make you less materialistic if it solidifies the notion that you can find more meaning and fulfilment in having new experiences than buying more stuff. But even so, the pursuit of experiences can take on the flavour of materialism and be all about boosting one’s ego. Sneering at 'materialistic people' pursuing status kind of falls flat when travelling, for instance, becomes a kind of status-seeking game.

One-Upping


One-upping is, I think, the most obvious example of how travelling can turn into a status game. It can happen when you have someone telling a travel story, then someone else – instead of genuinely taking interest in the story – uses it as an opportunity to one-up the person. There can definitely be a competitive and boastful nature about recounting stories about extreme budgeting or how crazy/adventurous/beautiful/special/’authentic’/’spiritual’ an experience was.

This doesn’t mean that living on $10 a day in Nepal or visiting hill tribes in Myanmar isn’t worth sharing with others, but I’ve seen travellers turn the telling and swapping of stories into a status-boosting game. So if someone lived on $10 a day, then someone else might interject with how they lived on even less (but probably had less of a good time) or if someone visited a hill tribe, then someone else might reply with how they visited a hill tribe in an even more remote region. And this kind of muddies what could otherwise be a genuine and engaging conversation.

People who espouse a distaste for the status-seeking behaviour of ‘materialistic people’ may be chasing ‘experiential status’ or have a ‘spiritual ego’ that’s worth examining.

Promoting Our Social Media Selves


As I've written elsewhere, we often use social media as a way to present and promote ourselves as a brand. On Facebook and Instagram, we create a highlights reel of our lives and, in turn, a perfected version of who we are. The very nature of social media encourages this. It's part of the reason that we feel so eager to post photos of our awesome experiences because gaining a positive reputation is naturally rewarding. If people are motivated to share news on social media as a way to attain status, then I think it's likely that certain experiences are shared for that reason as well; so we can give an impression to others of what we are like.

There is no doubt a competitive edge to all of those irritating and heavily filtered travel photos all over Instagram. The perfectly orchestrated and cliche pose, and over-saturation of colour and hashtags are all there to try and impress others.

If any of these points sound judgemental, I’ve been guilty myself of one-upping and constant travel updates on Facebook. Experientialism shouldn’t mean being more excited about showing off an experience than actually having it. An ‘experiential ego’ can be problematic in a similar way to a ‘spiritualised ego’

All worthy pursuits are susceptible to egotism. It's important to maintain awareness of the 'games' we might be playing. We are all guilty of playing these ego games. But we don’t have to get trapped in them.

A Healthy Response to Privilege is Gratitude, Not Guilt

$
0
0

It’s easy to feel guilty about having an advantage in life due to the accident of being born in a first-world country to a middle-class family. Being able to travel is considered an incredible luxury – more like a pipe dream, really – by nearly half of the world’s population, who live on less than $2.50 a day. Travelling is an experience that most people in the world will never have.

As a Westerner, if you travel to a developing country, you realise how privileged you actually are. Or, at least, that’s a crucial realisation to have (travel doesn’t automatically give you a balanced perspective of the world). Sometimes this realisation can conjure up feelings of guilt.

You may also feel guilty when you compare your life situation to your peers. The philosopher Alain de Botton argues in his book Status Anxiety that we feel more anxious about our status in relation to those with slightly higher levels of status than those with much higher levels. We feel more anxiety about an acquaintance being promoted and receiving a pay rise than we do about Bill Gates earning billions. ‘Keeping up with the Joneses’ is something we feel more strongly than thoughts about how we’re failing in comparison to the extremely wealthy.

Perhaps this principle also applies to privilege and guilt. We may feel more guilty about being born into a wealthier family than a friend than we do when we compare ourselves to distant strangers living in poverty.

In any case, we aren’t all born with equal opportunities. Some people take their privileges for granted. Others feel resentment and bitterness towards those who those who have been luckier in life. And others feel guilty about having it easier than their peers.

All three of these perspectives are misguided. Not even recognising that you are privileged in some way may prevent you from appreciating what you have. Feeling bitter about the lives of others isn’t going to change your or their situation; it’s only going to leave you feeling bitter, which is no fun. And all that feeling guilty does is bring you down – it makes you feel worse about yourself. Besides, you can’t repent for the ‘sin’ of being wealthier than someone else.

A healthy response to privilege – such as being able to enjoy an abundance of travel experiences – isn’t a guilt trip, but gratitude. It makes no sense to feel unwarranted guilt for being dealt a good hand in life. Whilst you can’t change the inherent unfairness of life, you can develop a thankful attitude for the experiences that are available to you. Moreover, fully appreciating what you have often reinforces the impulse to be kind and generous.

The important thing is to be respectful and positively impactful. The upside of the privilege of travel, for example, is that it improves not just your own life, but the lives of others as well. Tourism stimulates local economies and creates jobs that otherwise wouldn’t exist. Travel can, therefore, be an opportunity to spread the wealth. Travelling can also change your outlook, attitudes and behaviours; and allow you to develop yourself in a way that can benefit others – whether abroad or at home.

You don’t want to be embarrassed about taking advantage of opportunities for travel. At the same time, you don’t want to flaunt travel experiences in the way that the Rich Kids of Instagram flaunt their material wealth for admiration. In contrast, gratitude – the development of which does not always come easily or naturally, but which involves constant reminders to yourself about what you have – enriches life experiences, for both you and everyone else you meet along the way.

The Visionary Art of Android Jones

$
0
0
Android Jones is a digital artist from Colorado who uses various software programs to recreate his visionary experiences. For him, his art is a kind of spiritual endeavour. He says:


I've seen things in this life that I am incapable of translating into words. In my practice I have visited realms where the imagination ends, and the terrifying beauty of infinity unfolds over and over again. 
If I could distill into words exactly what motivates me to create the art that I make than it would not be worth making it. Instead I have chosen the Pen. 
Honestly I don’t know why I make this art, or what compels me to keep creating it; it’s a mystery I intend to pursue for the rest of my life, and each image brings me closer to the Ultimate Truth.


Android Jones has also collaborated with electronic artist Tipper - his artwork was used as the album cover for Forward Escape, and he has created mind-bending, real-time visual shows for some of Tipper’s sets.


The Rising Popularity of DMT

$
0
0

The internet has enabled McKenna’s lectures – and, in turn, his fascinating descriptions of the DMT experience – to circulate among the curious and experimental. But while the DMT Preacher has played a highly influential role in raising people’s awareness and interest in this strange substance, other factors have been at play in the rising popularity of ‘elf spice’, as it is sometimes colloquially referred to online. One book, in particular, should be credited with this effect, and that is Dr Rick Strassman’s DMT: The Spirit Molecule (2001).

Strange, Alien Encounters


This book details Strassman’s research with DMT between 1990 and 1995 at the General Clinical Research Center of the University of New Mexico Hospital. Strassman was the first person to legally administer a psychedelic to people in the US in 20 years. By the mid-70s, the legal exploration of the therapeutic value of psychedelics was put to a stop. Under the Controlled Substances Act - signed into law by then-President Richard Nixon in 1970 - DMT was classified as a Schedule I drug. And it still is today. Using the current definition of a Schedule I drug, this means that DMT “has a high potential for abuse” and “there is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or substance under medical supervision.”

The prohibited status of DMT made it extremely arduous for Strassman to be able to carry out his research. In the book, Strassman charts the Kafkaesque and labyrinthine process of jumping over regulatory hurdles. He had to gain approval from both the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) and the Research Center’s Scientific Advisory Committee at the University of New Mexico. But whilst negotiating with these university committees, Strassman also had to grapple with two US federal agencies that constituted the final, regulatory barriers. And this proved very challenging indeed. These agencies were the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Strassman told the committees that the study would not begin until both the FDA and DEA gave permission to administer DMT.

The DEA would decide whether Stassman would be allowed to possess DMT and if so, would be granted a Schedule I permit. Meanwhile, the FDA was to decide whether it was safe to administer the drug to humans, with the license taking the form of an Investigational New Drug (IND) permit. Strassman had to carefully and meticulously write up his study proposal, as well as obtain the drug, which also proved difficult. Eventually, after a series of meetings, letters and phone calls, Strassman gained approval from the FDA and DEA. Two years after Strassman submitted his proposal to the HREC in 1988, they concluded it was safe to proceed with the study. Strassman obtained full approval for the DMT research in late 1990 and soon began the experiments with human volunteers. And the experiences that participants reported turned out to be very bizarre, in a way that Strassman did not anticipate.

And it is these reports, of weird and wonderful realms, that give DMT an enticing edge over the other psychedelics. Strassman’s groundbreaking research helped to bring this earth-shattering experience to the public’s attention. But he wasn’t the only person who helped elevate DMT’s popularity. Awareness of the substance also seeped into people’s consciousness through many different mediums.

Artwork


The visionary artist Alex Grey is often credited with given uncannily accurate depictions of the DMT experience. The colour schemes, nets and lattices, patterns, symbols, and faces connected to the surrounding environment, are all reminiscent of DMT. One of Grey’s paintings, Transfiguration (1993), is directly influenced by DMT. Following a dream in which Grey had been painting this potential creation, envisioning a human undergoing a profound transformation. But later that week, he smoked DMT for the very first time. As he recounts in Transfigurations (2001):

As I inhaled the immediately active and extremely potent psychedelic, I experienced the transfigured subject of my painting firsthand. In my vision my feet were the foundation of the material world. As I inhaled, the material density of my body seemed to dissolve and I “popped” into the bright world of living geometry and infinite spirit. I noticed strange jewel-like chakra centers within my glowing wire-frame spirit body and spectral colors that were absent from my dream painting. I was in my future painting and was being given an experience of the state so I could better re-create it.

Another of Grey’s paintings, Net of Being (2002-2006) – also used as the artwork for progressive rock band Tool’s album 10,000 Days (2006) – is inspired by Grey’s experience with ayahuasca in Brazil. Other ayahuasca-inspired artwork hadn’t quite revealed a space like the one that Grey encountered during his experience in Brazil. But containing DMT as the psychoactive ingredient, it should be no surprise that there will be parallels between the oral and smoked experience. In any case, the painting – featuring multifaceted, godly heads arranged in columns; connected in a cosmic infinite net – captures quite closely what the DMT space is like for many people. The same applies to the kind of entity depicted in paintings such as BardoBeing (2002), where personally, I think Grey nails the patterns, colours and vibe of DMT.

DMT’s influence can also be seen in the paintings of Adam Scott Miller, in pieces such as ‘Rhizomorphic Resonance’ (very similar to Grey’s ‘Net of Being’), ‘The Witness’‘Wisdom’s Dare’, and ‘Parabolic Vehicle of Conception’. Visionary artist Xavi paints the DMT realm in a work titled ‘Podular Manifestation’. Some alien entity is depicted, cross-legged in a mudra pose, and manifesting out of the organic, hi-tech environment. Randal Roberts recreates the moment of breaking through hyperspace in his piece ‘Divine Messenger of Truth’ (the acronym of which is DMT). Another close representation is ‘DMT’, created by Cobalt358 and shared on DeviantArt, an online social community for artists. And artist Jonathan Solter emulates hyperspace in works such as ‘I’ve Been There’‘Green Cubed’ and ‘The Space Between’. Here are some examples of my own artwork influenced by DMT. They are very crude representations of the DMT experience and entities (as all representations are), but for me personally, they do capture, to some extent, the idiosyncratic ‘DMT vibe’.

Other visionary artists have been bringing the DMT experience to life using computers to generate, manipulate or process their artwork. This enables them to better recreate many aspects of the DMT experience, especially its intricate, complex and fractal nature. Digital artist Luke Brown recreates the DMT entities in pieces such as ‘Namaste’‘Alpha Centauri’‘Jesterrestrial’‘Apotheosis’ and ‘Baphomet’. SalviaDroid, whose digital art originally focused on salvia’s influence (hence his name), soon drew on the DMT experience for inspiration. This is reflected in pieces such as ‘The D33MST3R’ (‘deemster’ being a nickname for DMT), ‘Inner Divinity’‘The God Source’‘Death by Astonishment’ and ‘Padawan’. Symbolika reproduces the patterns, colours and entities of DMT in works such as ‘DMT HD’‘Chango’ and ‘Trinfinity’. Digital artist INCEDIGRIS has created pieces which many DMT users remark as being eerily accurate; these include ‘MINIME’‘DNA DINER’ and ‘BUDDHAMID’.

Music


While Grey was communicating the DMT experience through his art, other artists used the experience as inspiration for their musical endeavours. Psychedelic music project Shpongle, made up of Simon Posford and Raja Ram, have a track called "Divine Moments of Truth" (DMT), which features on their debut album Are You Shpongled (1998). Their second album Tales of the Inexpressible (2001) features the track "A New Way to Say Hooray", inspired by McKenna’s lecture ‘Sacred Plants as Guides: New Dimensions of the Soul’. In this lecture, McKenna describes the entity contact during the DMT experience, saying “The gnomes have learned a new way to say hooray”. McKenna himself drew inspiration from Pink Floyd’s song "The Gnome", which features the lyrics, "Another way for gnomes to say hoooooooooray". McKenna refers to the “cheer” that the entities give you as you enter their space. The influence of DMT pervades Shpongle’s music. You get a sense of it from the glitchy and hallucinogenic sounds and distorted alien voices.

In a 2012 MAPS bulletin, author David Jay Brown interviewed Simon Posford, discussing the connection between psychedelics and Shpongle’s music. When asked how psychedelics affected his musical creativity, Posford said, “…massively, and on a profound level.” Brown praises Shpongle, saying “it really comes close to capturing the multidimensional state of consciousness that one is in during a psychedelic experience.” Posford’s musical ingenuity and intense focus on his music allow him to turn “tambourines…into liquid drops of nectar”, and convert “vocals…to voices of the cosmos.” Shpongle’s music also features springy and squeezing sounds, Brazilian music, Eastern ethnic instruments and chanting. Everything is highly textured and multi-layered, and this too helps to recreate the feeling of being in hyperspace. Shpongle’s use of cultural styles from around the world and fun, crazy and euphoric soundscapes combine to create something very DMT-like in nature.

When it comes to DMT, Posford it is “by far the most profound of all the psychedelics” that he has tried. He talks about meeting these entities:


…without bodies or physical features, more like a collection of intelligent energy continually shapeshifting that communicated with me through a variety of mediums, not all of them language, sometimes color, sound, or a form of telepathy that I cannot describe with mere words. One of the things they said to me was, ‘Oh, we’re so glad to see you! You made it! You’re here.’  
Then they started examining me in a very frivolous, excited, joyful, and playful kind of way. When I say examining me I don’t mean physically or medically, which would be horrible. Rather, it was like all of the information in my brain was accessible to them. The hard drive was open, so to speak, and they were rebooting me. They were feeding me information, nourishing me…

Posford also mentions how he gained musical inspiration from this experience, similar to the way in which Grey found inspiration for his painting TransfigurationPosford continues:

I could see the music we had been working on leaving my head as a flowing liquid mercurial stream of holographic colored symbols, and these ‘machine elves’ as Terence McKenna calls them, appeared to be getting off on it. They were dancing, laughing and enjoying it. There was a little flute riff in there, that we could all see, it was red and blue and melting like one of Dali’s clocks. These creatures suddenly turned serious and told me, ‘You have to go back and find this particular flute riff. It is the divine riff, and this is the one that you have to use’.

Posford went back to the recordings and found one of Raja Ram’s flute riffs and it resonated with Posford. But it wasn’t quite right. So he asked Raja Ram to replay the melody. Posford says that “we got as close as we could get” with recapturing that DMT flute riff. It was then featured in the track “Behind Closed Eyelids”, which is on the album Are You Shpongled?

DMT has also been referenced by many other bands and artists. On Tool’s 10,000 Days, the track “Rosetta Stoned” mentions “Yogi DMT”. Producer Flying Lotus (aka FlyLo) has recounted an experience smoking DMT while listening to Radiohead’s “Pyramid Song”. After the third and final hit he said:

There was no pain, no fear. It felt natural, and beautiful, slipping away… 
Leaving my body.  
Feeling weightless, not connected to 'me’, 'my’ apartment, 'my’ world. I felt like a free floating spirit.   
Any worries or fears that I had about ANYTHING would quickly be replaced with overwhelming feelings of love and warmth. It felt like the universe hugged me and held me tight. Despite the chaos, there was nothing to fear, this is a place of loving energy.

On FlyLo’s album Until the Quiet Comes (2012), one of the tracks is called “DMT Song”, featuring musician Thundercat. Electronic musician XXYYXX also dedicated a track to this compound, simply called “DMT”. Meanwhile, there is a metal band called DMT, who might just be inspired by the elf spice as well. Country singer Sturgill Simpson’s second album Metamodern Sounds in Country Music (2014) is noted for being nominated for a Grammy Award for Best Americana Album, being listed 18th on Rolling Stone’s ’50 Best Albums of 2014’, and also being named among ‘NPR’s Favorite Albums of 2014’. And the first track, and second single, on that album “Turtles All the Way Down” includes references to psychedelics, including DMT:

There's a gateway in our mind that leads somewhere out there beyond this planeWhere reptile aliens made of light cut you open and pull out all your painTell me how you make illegal something that we all make in our brainSome say you might go crazy but then again it might make you go sane  Marijuana, LSD, Psilocybin, and DMTThey all changed the way I see

Mainstream Culture


In this way, DMT has been making its way into mainstream culture and awareness. People are no longer asking “What is DMT?” but “Where can I get some?” More and more people are hearing about DMT, and it’s wild and mystifying reputation is piquing people’s curiosity. Mainstream interest in DMT has increased since the release of Gaspar Noe’s film Enter the Void (2009), which features a scene in which the protagonist Oscar smokes DMT. While the trip sequence may not present the viewer with a hint of what the DMT experience is actually like (it needs to be faster with more elves!) it still transmits the feeling that the DMT experience is something that causes a dissolution of reality, and an emergence into a psychedelic fireworks show. So here we have an award-winning movie, introducing the substance DMT to people for the first time.

Then in 2010, there was the release of the documentary DMT: The Spirit Molecule (based on Strassman’s book), which was later available on Netflix. This long-obscured drug was now being unveiled to the masses. Presented by UFC commentator and comedian Joe Rogan, the documentary features interviews with an array of psychedelic spokespeople, such as Strassman himself, Alex Grey, Charles Grob, Neal Goldsmith, Roland Griffiths, and Graham Hancock. This documentary really helped to communicate the intensity and mystery of this elusive experience to a much wider audience.

Then, Vice magazine published two articles: ‘Interviews with People Who Just Smoked DMT’ (2012) and ‘DMT: You Cannot Imagine a Stranger Drug or a Stranger Experience’ (2014). The former, as you can tell, involved giving people DMT and then interviewing them about their experiences. The latter, written by journalist Tao Lin, gives the reader a roughly chronological sequence of the DMT experience, based on a composite of McKenna’s talks. Mainstream media also picked up on the rise of DMT, with Huffington Post publishing an article entitled ‘If You Haven’t Heard of DMT, You Might Soon’.

The Global Drug Survey – the biggest drug survey in the world – noted the influence of entertainment and media on rates of the use of DMT. One of the researchers on its team, Adam Winstock, said:

Mainstream interest since the release of the cult film “Enter the Void” in 2009 and the 2010 documentary “DMT: The Spirit Molecule”, followed by a recent article in the influential youth magazine Vice featuring young people who had just smoked DMT will have raised awareness.

Winstock also had a paper published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology titled Dimethyltryptamine (DMT): Prevalence, user characteristics and abuse liability in a large global sample (2013). It uses data found from the Global Drug Survey, concluding that DMT:

had a larger proportion of new users compared with the other substances (24%), suggesting its popularity may increase.

Potential Risks


It should be noted that the Global Drug Survey is not a random sample. It has a selection bias, in the sense that those who regularly use drugs, or have an active interest in drugs, are more likely to fill out the survey than those who don’t. So it cannot provide accurate data of the prevalence of the use of a certain drug. However, some key trends can still be identified. For example, in the 2012 Global Drug Survey, researchers highlighted that users have a relatively low urge to use more of the drug. Indeed, in his email exchange with Terence McKenna, Grateful Dead drummer Robert Hunter underscores that DMT’s “abuse potential is rock bottom”. DMT has not been found to be physically or psychologically addictive. Even though the experiences can be positive, euphoric and pleasurable beyond the user’s wildest dreams, it still does not tempt them with regular use. Part of this has to do with the sheer intensity of the experience. Hunter agrees with McKenna about the difficulty of finding the “raw courage” to use DMT again. Elsewhere in a lecture, McKenna remarked:

I think that DMT is as intense as any drug should ever get; I don't ever want to be more loaded than that. I don't think you can be more loaded than that and come back.

DMT’s unique intensity factor means that after one experience, it may be a while before the individual has any urge to experiment again. Or they might find the experience just too intense for their taste and never seek it out again. The experience also has a kind of abuse-correcting mechanism, whereby, if the user has been using DMT too much or too casually, she will get ‘told’ that she is not meant to be there. Many negative experiences with DMT seem to centre around the fact that the user was disrespecting the power of the substance. In the DMT lexicon, this is known as a ‘hyper slap’, in which the user will find themselves being punished by the entities in some way. This is an example of when ‘set’ can make a huge difference to the quality of the experience. The attitude you bring to the experience – i.e. humility and respect or impulsivity and hedonism – can influence whether you enter a kind of heaven or hell.

More Evidence of DMT's Rising Popularity


Other research bears out this trend in DMT’s increasing popularity. For example, the US government’s National Survey on Drug Use and Health found that the number of people in the US who have used DMT in some form has been up almost every year since 2006. 688,000 people had used DMT in 2006, and in 2012 this increased to 1,475,000. What this means is that there are a lot of people out there who are in search, who feel drawn to, the possibility of a deep, mystical experience. As mentioned before, DMT has an advantage over the other psychedelics because the duration of the trip is so short – you could have a mystical experience and be more or less sober after 10 minutes.

Salvia also has a short duration, but unlike DMT, many people find it to be a much more uncomfortable experience, and not as loving or comforting in the way that the DMT experience is. (It should be noted, however, that salvia is technically a dissociative rather than a psychedelic. It is also legal to buy in head shops, so many people who experiment with it might not have had previous experiences with powerful, altered states of consciousness, or might casually use it in unfavourable settings or circumstances.) Salvia is sometimes referred to as the ‘evil twin’ of DMT. In any case, what attracts many people to DMT, especially those who already use psychedelics or are spiritually inclined, is that it tempts you with the very real possibility of a mystical experience. And all you need is 10 minutes of your time. Who can’t spare 10 minutes?

With more and more people using DMT, online communities were formed, with users describing their experiences, asking questions, offering interpretations, and sharing in the mystery. DMT-Nexus is a website set up to provide information about DMT. Reddit also has a ‘subreddit’ (an area of interest) dedicated to DMT. Other drugs forums, such as Erowid, Bluelight and Shroomery have also become useful resources for reading DMT trip reports.

It is because of the internet that DMT has become so much more widely available. If you don’t know anyone who has it, you can just read up on an extraction method, buy the root bark online, and with some basic ‘kitchen chemistry’, you can end up with your own supply. And if that doesn’t appeal to you (since it takes time and does involve using sodium hydroxide, which is strongly irritating and corrosive), using the ‘dark web’ is another way to obtain DMT. The dark web is a subset of the ‘deep web’, that part of the web (99% of the internet - hence why it’s called ‘deep’) that isn’t accessible by search engines. The dark web is a smaller subset of the deep web, and like the deep web requires special software, such as the Tor browser, to access it. Tor allows users to anonymously to surf the net. However, it isn’t perfect. Fundamentally, Tor allows private and secure communication, but de-anonymisation is possible under certain circumstances.

By using the Tor browser, dark net markets can be accessed. These function primarily as online black markets where drugs – as well as weapons, counterfeit currency, forged documents and stolen credit card details – can be purchased. Payments are made using cryptocurrency, a digital currency based on cryptography, which secures the transaction. Bitcoin is the original cryptocurrency and is the most valuable on the market. Silk Road was the first modern darknet market. It was described as the Amazon or eBay of drugs, using an eBay-like vendor feedback system. Silk Road was shut down by the FBI in October 2013. Ross Ulbricht, who created and ran Silk Road, was arrested and later sentenced to life in prison without parole. Then Silk Road 2.0 emerged, but this was shut down by the FBI and Europol on 6 November 2014.

However, if you cut one head off of the hydra, many new ones will appear. And this is exactly what happened with darknet markets. Many other, similar marketplaces cropped up following Silk Road’s demise. And DMT is there to purchase. Anyone who’s interested in experimenting with DMT, by just putting in a small amount of effort in learning how to access and use darknet markets, can do so. Moreover, it is not just freebase DMT that’s available, but also ‘changa’ – a DMT-infused smoking blend. Online resources, such as DMT-Nexus, provide a step-by-step process for making it. Sometimes called ‘smokeable ayahuasca’, changa is made up of the leaves of B. caapi (which contains MAOIs), infused with DMT. But other herbs can be used in the mixture for their different properties, including passionflower (also an MAOI), mullein, mugwort, mint and blue lotus.

The MAOI-containing plants are said to lengthen the experience, as well as make it more ayahuasca-like (since the brew, unlike freebase, contains MAOIs). Changa is also believed to offer a more grounded experience than freebase, with the onset being smoother, making it much more user-friendly experience. It is also much easier to smoke, unlike freebase, which can easily be burnt and wasted. While an experience with changa can be every bit as powerful and profound as freebase, it is considered to be more approachable. It is less of a slap in the face and blast off-type experience, and more like being whisked off to hyperspace and gently guided through. Many users report less speed, confusion, chaos and turbulence compared to freebase.

All of these changes have been working together to make DMT a more accessible and popular substance of choice. But its rising popularity has also generated a plethora of misconceptions and speculations. In this respect, the DMT experience is something that can be simultaneously demystified and mystified.

Why You Should Be Mindful of Always Reaching for the Camera

$
0
0

You can’t capture every exciting scene you see. Surely there must be some balance to strike between being fully attuned to new and interesting surroundings and capturing it to share with others and to look back on in the future nostalgic reminiscing.

We often find ourselves with an inexorable urge to reach for the camera in every situation that seems ‘photogenic’ or ‘worth capturing’. There’s the initial wow reaction, followed instinctively by the ‘I have to solidify this moment’ reaction. I have sometimes thought that without a photo an experience is somehow less worthwhile. But does thinking about taking photos, and spending time taking photos, not prevent you from fully appreciating and being completely immersed in a moment? On the other hand, having a photo allows you to more concretely go back to a place in a way that your memory may fail to do so.

Part of the camera-reaching urge is also influenced by an excited anticipation of social media approval. Facebook is not just a networking site, but also a platform where we promote ourselves as a ‘brand’, with the marketing aim of self-validation. In a social media-frenzied society, is an experience less worthwhile if you can’t share it?

I think the answer depends on how you define ‘worthwhile’. You can decide for yourself whether a photo and Facebook likes add meaning and worth to the experience. But if you believe it does, this may actually detract from the experience itself, especially if attention and prioritisation of value are placed on the photo and its approval, instead of how it actually felt to be in that moment, which neither a photo nor approval can properly signify.

Being mindful of this ‘must capture’ urge is important. Getting carried away by it and spending more time taking photos than actually looking will leave you with fewer memories (which contain what was felt) and more images (which are devoid of that same emotional charge).

Remembering the Feeling of a Place


Sometimes you can be utterly transfixed at a unique event or a beautiful vista. There may be a tension between wanting to fully experience a precious moment and wanting to capture it to look back on. This conflict is captured in the film The Secret Life of Walter Mitty, where Walter (Ben Stiller) finally finds photographer Sean O’Connell (Sean Penn) who he has been on a whirlwind adventure searching for. O’Connell sees the snow leopard he has been waiting to capture in a remote Himalayan region of Pakistan. His camera is ready and the dialogue goes as follows:

Walter Mitty: “When are you going to take it?”
Sean O'Connell: “Sometimes I don't. If I like a moment, for me, personally, I don't like to have the distraction of the camera. I just want to stay in it.”
Walter Mitty: “Stay in it?”
Sean O'Connell: “Yeah. Right there. Right here.”

Attention is a limited resource: if you’re thinking about the experience (i.e. I should get my phone out and record this), then less attention is directed towards exactly where the action is. And this impacts the memory of the experience.



“If I like a moment, for me, personally, I don’t like to have the distraction of the camera. I just want to stay in it.”

Capture More, Remember Less


No photo or video can encapsulate the feeling of being in a particular place at a certain time in your life. There is a risk that if you spend too much time taking photos and recording where you are and what is happening, that you won’t even recall these unique emotional and mental states, which seem far more valuable than the image making people jealous on Instagram.

Research shows that taking too many photos can affect your memory. Psychologist Maryanne Garry says “the problem is that people are giving away being in the moment.” Another study found that taking photos leads to an impairment of memory since subjects in the study remember fewer concrete details of the experience in question. “As soon as you hit ‘click’ on that camera, it’s as if you’ve outsourced your memory,” said Linda Henkel, a psychologist and author of the study. The camera is doing the job of forming the memory, instead of your brain. However, Henkel’s research also discovered that paying proper attention when taking a photograph can improve memory retention.

Henkel stresses that in order to remember, we should access and interact with photos – to reminisce – instead of having them stored away in a disorganised mess never to be looked at.

A Happy Medium


I’ve personally found that taking one’s time with both photos and being present in a place is the best way to remember details of that experience. Of course, it’s easy to feel rushed and distracted. But if you remember to slow down and really look at the whole scene and notice all of the details – whether you’re taking a photo or not – then you’re likely to remember more of the experience. So, by all means, take 100 photos of the same scene, but don’t forget to spend some time appreciating what’s actually in front of you.

Escape Through Travel Doesn't Always Work

$
0
0

Sometimes your circumstances might make you want to run away. And then you do. When you are no longer entangled in an environment that you felt was making you unhappy, just the very act of changing your scenery can be a relief and an opportunity to re-evaluate aspects of your life. It might be just what you need. Novelist Alex Garland makes this point in the backpacker classic The Beach:

Escape through travel works. Almost from the moment I boarded my flight, life in England became meaningless. Seat-belt signs lit up, problems switched off. Broken armrests took precedence over broken hearts. By the time the plane was airborne I'd forgotten England even existed.

While everyone understands the need to take a holiday from work, not everyone gets the urge to leave everything and everyone behind, and go away for a long time. It can seem like an immature coping mechanism or avoidance strategy. Why can’t people just deal with the challenges of the real world? And in some sense, that opinion holds true. Travel can be an easy but ultimately short-term fix for a deeper problem. Escapism can be good, but not all the time.

In philosopher Alain de Botton’s documentary The Art of Travel (based on his book of the same title), Botton notes how often we want to travel to escape ourselves, but find that we have brought not just our suitcase and our clothes with us, but our mental baggage as well. We hope to leave all of our anxiety, stress and insecurities at home – and maybe some people do, or they become more of a subtle background noise – but often a new location is not, in and of itself, an antidote to these types of issues.

The Roman philosopher Seneca spoke about this phenomenon in Letters from a Stoic:

Do you suppose that you alone have had this experience? Are you surprised, as if it were a novelty, that after such long travel and so many changes of scene you have not been able to shake off the gloom and heaviness of your mind? You need a change of soul rather than a change of climate. Though you may cross vast spaces of sea, and though, as our Vergil remarks, Lands and cities are left astern, your faults will follow you whithersoever you travel.

Seneca was of the opinion that travel is not a cure for our discontent. It may be a temporary relief, but the happy, care-free and confident self that you were while travelling may be left behind when you return home. Perhaps this also explains part of why the post-travel blues can be so intense for some people.

When you come home, you are not just ending a way of living, but becoming separated from what you considered to be the best version of yourself. But in a sense, the travel experience does not end when you come home. You have the opportunity to bring back positive characteristics with you. But it can’t be taken as a given. It involves a certain amount of introspection and integration.

If there is some inner work to be done, or especially if you are experiencing a mental health problem, staying put might be more beneficial in the long-term, even if it feels like home is the root cause of your dissatisfaction. Home is where your supportive networks exist, and it’s where professional help is most easily sought.

However, every individual is different. Escape through travel can work if it’s taken as a break from the 9-to-5 grind in a career you don’t particularly want to commit your life to. On the other hand, if you want to take a break from yourself, or expect to change in some incredible way and bring this awesome person back with you, this is probably too idealistic. Who you are is intimately shaped by your surroundings. It might be a shock to find yourself engaging in old, negative habits when you come home, but it’s not that surprising really.

There is also something to be said about ‘staycations’ – exploring your own city or country might not be a mind-blowing experience, and certainly not a culture shock, but this does not devalue the experience.

There is nothing wrong with escapism, but it can be useful to take a step back and think about what (and why) you are escaping, and how to turn escapism into a beneficial experience. 

The Ethics of Haggling in Developing Countries

$
0
0

Frugality is a virtue, especially when it comes to travelling. There is a problem, however, when frugality turns selfish; when a penny-pinching mentality is adopted in developing countries, and you start haggling over certain things, involving differences in price that are more or less negligible for you.

No one likes to be ripped off, especially by taxi drivers (all too common). When travelling, there are scams abound. Moreover, ‘tourist prices’ in some countries, which soar above what locals pay, can seem like an unacceptable form of discrimination. But while all of this can leave a bad taste in your mouth, and be a cause for indignation, it does not excuse extreme haggling with local vendors. Being unnecessarily insistent on paying as little as possible for everything, everywhere, and at all times is done without any perspective on relative incomes, and in turn, the relative worth of money.

Most backpackers are from developed, westernised countries, and so prices in Southeast Asia will always be a bargain compared to back home. And whatever you pay, relatively speaking, goes a long way for a local, compared to you. By desperately haggling a $1 souvenir to half or you’re leaving, you’re not developing bargaining skills, you’re developing skills in being inconsiderate.

Take Nepal as an example. Over half (54%) of the population lives on less than $1.25 a day. If you adopt an insistent and unrelenting haggling approach, then you are limiting the valuable contributions you could make during your visit. In Nepal, tourism plays a crucial role in generating jobs and growth to the economy.

This is part of the reason why the earthquake that struck the country on 25 April 2015 was so devastating because it resulted in a massive decline in tourism. Tourism can achieve much more for a country compared to voluntourism, which often causes more harm than good.

The point is that by penny-pinching in a developing country, you are barely benefiting yourself, whilst massively depriving others. It involves forgetting your arbitrary advantages and privileges – such as being able to travel in the first place – and subsequently disregarding the disadvantages and lives of others, who aren’t as lucky as you.

It could be useful to apply some utilitarian calculating to these situations. Utilitarianism is a broad branch of ethical philosophy that generally promotes the maxim that actions should seek to maximise the good (however defined). It is similar in many ways to a cost-benefit analysis.

In a situation where you are haggling with a local in a developing country, if you factor in the relative costs and benefits of penny-pinching, it starts to seem like an incredibly selfish thing to do. But more than the living wage you are depriving the person of, it will leave them with a negative impression of tourists. It might not make for a healthy exchange between people from different cultures.

It’s natural to want to score a bargain and there’s nothing wrong with that. Frugality is a positive trait. But a loss of perspective on your privileges isn’t.

The Rise in Student Suicides Shows How Mental Health Treatment is Lacking

$
0
0


A study published in September by think tank IPPR has found that suicide among UK university students is at record levels. In addition, findings show that the number of students reporting a mental health issue has increased fivefold in the last 10 years. It’s not precisely clear why mental health issues and suicide is on the rise for students, although anxiety about the future has been cited as a reason by Ruth Caleb, wellbeing consultant at Brunel University. Caleb points out that worries about being weighed down by student debt could also be a factor.

Moving to a new city and starting out at university can be a really difficult period in one’s life. There is the added stress of getting a good degree so you can compete in a highly competitive graduate jobs market, and the pressure to be having the time of your life. While drinking heavily doesn’t take a toll on everyone’s mental health, it easily can do for some people.

There are many factors at play when a student’s mental health is negatively impacted. The root causes must be addressed and tackled. But the rise in student suicides also shows that there simply isn’t enough mental health support available.

Support is Lacking


Mark Salter, a spokesman for the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCP), says:

We know that the government needs to do much more to stop people reaching the level of desperation where they take their own lives. Suicide is preventable … without proper resourcing and funding, we will not reduce suicide in England.

And this is the crux of the problem. Mental health is still not taken as seriously as physical health (known as ‘parity of esteem’). In fact, mental health services have seen major cuts to funding. With these kinds of cuts taking place, it’s no surprise that many students are finding themselves without help, with people on a waiting list for therapy for months on end.

While antidepressants are easily prescribed and work for many, the combination of antidepressants and therapy can be more effective, while for other students, therapy – instead of antidepressants – may be the way forward. Without the necessary treatment readily available, students will continue to suffer.
If students try to use university counselling services instead of the NHS, they may also find support lacking. Craig Thorley, IPPR senior research fellow, highlights that “many university services are overwhelmed by the level of demand”. Thorley added that universities “should make a firm commitment to drive up quality and increase access to support services”.

Labour MP Luciana Berger stresses that “the wellbeing of students cannot be an afterthought”, while Sir Anthony Seldon, vice-chancellor of the University of Buckingham, said:

Some vice-chancellors still think [mental health care] is not the business of universities and it’s just about development of the mind, but developing minds means nothing unless you also help people learn how to become settled down and ready to learn.

Why We Need a ‘Zero Approach’ to Suicide


Suicide is preventable. No student should have to endure such a downward spiral that they feel compelled to take their own life. In 2015, Mersey Care became the first trust in the UK to adopt a Zero Suicide policy, committing to eliminating suicide from its care by 2020. All trusts should aim to eliminate suicide, not just reduce it, since the loss of someone to suicide is by no means inevitable, and when it happens, it is absolutely tragic and devastating. The UK government currently wants to reduce suicide by only 10% by 2020.

Even though effective and readily available treatment is lacking for many students, this doesn’t mean that help cannot be sought. As the saying goes, “A problem shared is a problem halved”. Unfortunately, there is still a great stigma attached to mental health issues, which leads many people to feel ashamed or embarrassed about speaking honestly and freely about their difficult thoughts and feelings. It can take immense bravery to speak up; but if you have a close relationship with someone who you can trust, simply having a chat can make a world of difference. Likewise, if you know someone who is struggling – a friend, partner, family member; whoever it may be – offering a listening ear can often be just what that person needs. 

The Visionary Art of Jonathan Solter

$
0
0

Jonathan Solter is a visionary artist from the Bay Area in California. He said he tries “to put as much detail into every painting as possible.” And looking at some of his artwork, this is clear: he paints brilliantly intricate ethereal worlds. His paintings often feature Shipibo patterns (influenced by ayahuasca) overlaid on pyramidal, temple-like and circuit board-type structures. The landscapes he creates are multi-layered, geometric, cosmic, ancient, fantastical and futuristic. Solter’s style in the visionary art scene is truly unique.

Addicted to Awe: Why Some People Turn Into 'Wonder Junkies'

$
0
0

I read an interesting article titled How Traveling Abroad in Your Twenties Will Ruin Your Life and the clickbait title dragged me into what I thought would be a rant on how travelling will ruin your career prospects. But what the author delivers instead is a tongue-in-cheek and extremely relatable sentiment about how travel obsession. For some people, travelling can turn them into a kind of ‘wonder junkie’.

The astronomer Carl Sagan coined the phrase ‘wonder junkie’ in his novel Contact:

She was a wonder junkie. In her mind, she was a hill tribesman standing slack-jawed before the real Ishtar Gate of ancient Babylon; Dorothy catching her first glimpse of the vaulted spires of the Emerald City of Oz…she was Pocohontas sailing up the Thames estuary with London spread out before her from horizon to horizon.

Awe is a unique emotion which, according to psychologist Dacher Keltner, is an experience which gives you goosebumps. This is putting it simply, of course. Awe is a complex emotion: it occurs in response to various stimuli; it is similar to both wonder and fear; and it has a transcending quality to it, putting us in the presence of something vast (like a star-filled sky or information about the universe).

Awe is a precious experience available to both the religious and non-religious. It has sometimes been questioned whether an atheist can feel awe at something if it’s simply the product of randomness and natural processes. However, there is nothing really simple or unimpressive about the Grand Canyon taking shape over the span of millions of years. This is one reason why the natural world as we see it today is so awe-inspiring if a reason has to be given at all.



But why is awe so addictive? Why might travelling turn you into a wonder junkie? The psychologist Abraham Maslow developed the concept of the ‘peak experience’, and these experiences fill individuals with a sense of awe. In his work Religions, Values and Peak-Experiences (1964), Maslow described peak experiences as “moments of highest happiness and fulfilment”, which demystifies these experiences in a way, since they have traditionally been viewed as religious experiences with supernatural causes.

Common triggers for peak experiences include art, nature, sex, creative work, music, introspection, drugs, meditation, repetitive drumming or dancing, and intense physical activity. In Toward a Psychology of Being (1962), Maslow highlights that peak experiences can involve being without inhibition, fear, doubt and self-criticism, and being completely mindful of the present moment without the influence of past or expected future experiences. He considered such experiences to be one of the most important goals of life, arguing that they are an indication of self-actualisation, first used by psychiatrist Kurt Goldstein to denote the motive to realise one’s full potential. In his book On Becoming a Person (1961), the psychologist Carl Rogers wrote of “the curative force in psychotherapy – man’s tendency to actualise himself, to become his potentialities…to express and activate all the capacities of the organism.”


Psychologist Abraham Maslow

There is a capacity in all of us to have peak experiences, and as Maslow and other psychologists have emphasised, having them can make us more fully human, animated and fulfilled on a different level that goes beyond our more basic needs and experiences of survival, safety, love/belonging and esteem. In terms of experiences worth having, peak experiences are perhaps the rarest, but also the most extraordinary and euphoric. Psychologist Dorothy Leach, in Meaning and Correlates of Peak Experiences, describes them as:

…a highly valued experience which is characterized by such intensity of perception, depth of feeling, or sense of profound significance as to cause it to stand out, in the subject’s mind, in more or less permanent contrast to the experiences that surround it in time and space.

The awe felt in these experiences is like no other and its unforgettable nature can compel people to seek it out thereafter. Awe has received little scientific attention, although some studies have shed some light on this fascinating emotion. A 2007 study by Shiota, Ketner and Mossman had participants write about a time that they recently experienced natural beauty. The subjects were more likely to report that they felt unaware of day-to-day concerns (not disinterested necessarily, but not pre-occupied), felt the presence of something greater, didn’t want the experience to end, felt connected with the world, and felt small or insignificant. Another study from Stanford University found that experiences of awe enhances well-being, as well as expanding your perception of time, which is interesting in itself.

It is not easy to forget about moments of awe or lump this emotion in with other more common positive emotions. For the wonder junkie, just like for the adrenaline junkie seeking thrills, it can become the pinnacle of human experience, a state of mind unlike any others; something worth pining for, craving and seeking out. After travelling and feeling what that unique intoxication is like, you might always itch for a hit of awe again, with ordinary life appearing colourless and uninteresting in comparison. In this way, perhaps there is a danger of being a wonder junkie if it makes you unable to be settled. On the other hand, there are many benefits to the experience of awe, including:

enhanced critical and creative thinking faculties, improved health, a sense of embeddedness into collective folds and an increase in pro-social behaviours such as kindness, self-sacrifice, co-operation and resource-sharing.

Awe anchors us to the present moment and since being aware and attentive of the present moment is associated with improved well-being, it’s no surprise that many people become wonder junkies.

If you want to feel like being wowed by something, the performance philosopher and self-avowed wonder junkie Jason Silva has a great channel on YouTube called ‘Shots of Awe’, which features videos where Silva passionately tries to transmit this feeling of awe by giving us short, but powerful bursts of information on the nature of the universe, technological progress and human existence. 

How to Travel Ethically and With Personal Integrity

$
0
0

Travelling ethically means taking into account the consequences of your actions - how your travel choices and experiences impact people and the environment. You can do certain activities abroad that benefit cruel industries or you can make decisions that benefit local communities and wildlife instead. When these decisions are consistent with your moral principles, this shows that you are travelling with personal integrity. It’s easy to ignore, deny or downplay the negative effects of travel, especially when you just want to enjoy your adventure without getting bogged down with guilt. However, the dark side of tourism is able to flourish because of a lack of awareness, rather than people wilfully prioritising their personal enjoyment over human or animal suffering.

Exotic Experiences


In this respect, it is worth drawing attention to travellers' obsession with having 'exotic' experiences at the expense of people or animals. Elephant riding in Thailand is one example of this. Unwittingly, travellers are funding cruelty against endangered Asian elephants for the sake of an exotic experience that they can share on social media. I'm not blaming them – it boils down to a lack of awareness after all – but I think it's important to remember that with animals being used for any sort of entertainment, their well-being is likely jeopardised.

elephant-trekking-krabi 

Selfies With Tigers


The same applies to the Tiger Kingdoms in Chiang Mai and Phuket and the Tiger Temple in Kanchanaburi province (where 40 tiger cubs were found dead in a freezer). There is debate as to whether the animals are actually being sedated to allow people to pet them and pose next to them. Staff at these centres reassure travellers that they are not drugged; they say the animals’ placid and tame nature is due to how they’ve been trained. And many tourists trust these remarks, but other visitors aren’t convinced. On the other hand, one travel blogger who volunteered at the Tiger Kingdom in Chiang Mai reveals that there is no evidence (or good reason) for them to be drugged.

Nonetheless, even if these tigers aren’t being sedated, you have to take into account that these animals are still being exploited for profit. They cannot be released back into the wild (despite the Kingdoms claiming to be involved in conservation efforts); the adult tigers are kept in isolated cages 24 hours a day (except for photos), and at the Kanchanaburi centre, an investigation found the animals had been beaten, and deprived of food and water, in order to reinforce the dominance of the trainers. The WWF also highlights how the Tiger Temple in Kanchanaburi was “selling tigers and tiger parts on the black market for an enormous profit.”

tiger 

Visiting Hill Tribes


In Chiang Mai, there are also countless tourist agencies offering trips to visit hill tribes in the mountains. The hill tribes are not the indigenous people of Thailand, but Burmese refugees, who some say are being exploited in the name of tourism. Tourists come to snap some photos of the Paudang, commonly known as the ‘long-necked women’, but some human rights advocates argue the tourist attraction is nothing more than a 'human zoo'. And their gut feeling is more or less true. Thai authorities have allegedly refused to allow Kayans (another name for the Padaung people) to resettle outside tourist villages, claiming they are economic migrants and not real refugees. Apparently some of the women don't even want to wear the traditional metal rings around their necks, but feel pressured to do to endure the painful custom in order to make a living.



Moreover, tourist money is rarely given to the villagers directly and village owners will decrease their wages if women discuss their plight with visitors or use anything modern like mobile phones or computers. Here again we can see the self-centredness of travel (I want to have an exotic and authentic experience) causing real harm. This obsession with wanting to visit an authentic place is curious, because what it really means is that people want to see a place or a people completely devoid of modernisation and development, and therefore making that person seem more 'cultured' or 'travelled' for having visited. But as interesting as it may be to view such a way of life, to wish for it to exist for your own experiential satisfaction or bragging rights is unfair to people like the Padaung, who like you, also wish to have hot showers, a living wage, the Internet, movies, music, a decent education and everything else that improves one's quality of life.

Hopefully this discussion has offered some food for thought in terms of travelling ethically and with personal integrity. These are just a few examples of how tourism touches on human rights and animal welfare issues. Some tourist agencies genuinely respect these issues, while others do not. This applies to the environmental considerations as well. This doesn’t mean you shouldn’t see elephants or hill tribes in Thailand, only to do your research and make an informed decision about how to travel in a way that fits in with your moral values. For example, Elephant Nature Park in Chiang Mai is a well-respected sanctuary and rescue centre for elephants that pays special attention to the physical and mental well-being of the animals. There are also socially responsible companies that will take you to visit villages that are not being exploited, as well as opportunities to learn about the village (instead of treating it merely as a photo-op).

Can You Reconcile Environmentalism With Flying?

$
0
0

In terms of transport, flying is without a doubt the most environmentally damaging way to travel. The Environmental Transport Association (ETA) informs us that just one return flight from London to New York produces a greater carbon footprint than a whole year’s personal allowance needed to keep the climate safe. With constant warnings from climate scientists that we are approaching a ‘tipping point’ – a threshold for abrupt and irreversible change – personal choices to reduce carbon emissions begin to seem non-negotiable.

The Damage Caused by Flying


Back in 2006, journalist George Monbiot wrote an article arguing that We Are All Killers, so long as we keep flying that is. He stressed that there is no way (currently) of making high-speed, long-distance travel sustainable. As Monbiot highlights:

It’s not just that aviation represents the world’s fastest growing source of carbon dioxide emissions. The burning of aircraft fuel has a “radiative forcing ratio” of around 2.7. What this means is that the total warming effect of aircraft emissions is 2.7 times as great as the effect of the carbon dioxide alone. The water vapour they produce forms ice crystals in the upper troposphere (vapour trails and cirrus clouds) which trap the earth’s heat.

He adds:

…I have been discovering, greatly to my surprise, that every other source of global warming can be reduced or replaced to that degree without a serious reduction in our freedoms. But there is no means of sustaining long-distance, high-speed travel.

Changing Your Behaviour


These concerns have led the most eco-conscious to refrain from flying altogether. So the question has to be asked: can you really call yourself an environmentalist, or eco-conscious traveller, while relying on air travel to get around? It’s a question I barely consider when travelling, and probably intentionally ignore to avoid that cloud of guilt hanging over me as I sit in a metal tube pumping out a year’s personal allowance of CO2. Monbiot argues that many of us are fully aware of the harm caused by flying, yet we don’t really want to think about it:

This is now broadly understood by almost everyone I meet. But it has had no impact whatever on their behaviour. When I challenge my friends about their planned weekend in Rome or their holiday in Florida, they respond with a strange, distant smile and avert their eyes. They just want to enjoy themselves. Who am I to spoil their fun? The moral dissonance is deafening.

Indeed, findings show that this is the case. 

Making ethical or responsible choices isn’t always easy, and often involves compromising on one’s personal interests for the sake of some wider concern or more pressing issue. However, giving up flying may seem like a huge sacrifice, especially if travelling or living abroad is something that you’re passionate about.

Solutions


If you consider yourself an environmentalist, there are some ways to fly (relatively) guilt-free. If you do have to fly, you can choose a fuel-efficient airline and economy, not business class. For example, as illustrated in this useful article, the carbon output per passenger for a return flight from Amsterdam to London can be 241kg with KLM in economy class, but 730kg with British Airways in business class. In addition, some airlines offer the option of carbon off-setting to customers, whereby the extra cost goes towards environmental projects. However, as the article points out, the means of calculating carbon miles are vague, environmental projects aren’t specified, and other pollutants and environmental impacts are not taken into account.

This does appear to make sustainable travel somewhat difficult, especially if you’re a budget traveller and find that these fuel-efficient airlines and carbon offsetting options are too pricey. If you get a bit creative, you might find ways to overcome these setbacks. You could use what you would spend on carbon off-setting as a donation for an environmental project of your own choosing, use buses and trains whenever possible (many cities are connected by high-speed trains), or use ferries (unfortunately the one from Southampton to New York takes 6 uneventful days and will cost you about a grand).

If you’re the eco-conscious type thinking of a long trip, a more sustainable way to travel might involve travelling for longer (by relying on buses and trains) and not journeying too far – unless you have the time and money that is. Travelling in this way could be far more interesting, immersive and exciting than flying. You could then offset your guilt in some other ways perhaps?
Instead of flying, why not travel in a more eco-friendly and interesting way, like taking the Trans-Siberian Railway?

If we take into account the fact that animal agriculture contributes to 15% of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2003) – which is more than the combined contribution of all forms of transportation – then it is possible that being vegan for a year can offset the environmental impact of a return transatlantic flight. (It’s worth quickly pointing out that this 15% figure is uncontroversial – here’s the study, whereas the much higher figure of 51% highlighted in the acclaimed documentary Cowspiracy is based on a dodgy non-peer-reviewed report. Air travel, on the other hand, accounts for 2 to 3% of global CO2 emissions.

Do We Need to Give Up Flying?


Kristin Houser at Futurism claims that if you really care about reducing your carbon footprint, then the best thing you can do is stop flying altogether. In terms of work, Houser says:

Training sessions and meeting[s] can be conducted virtually, and shorter work trips can be completed via train or car instead of airplane. 
As for personal travel, spending the holidays at home or taking vacations within driving distance is the best option. For some, wanting to help save the planet could prove to be a great excuse for avoiding the in-laws next December.

It’s difficult to strike a balance between leading a personally fulfilling life and paying attention to the short- and long-term consequences of your actions. Yet that’s what any ethical and responsible traveller should be thinking about.

What do you think? Is giving up flying the only way to be consistent as an environmentalist? 

The Earliest Buddhist Teaching on Living in the Present Moment

$
0
0


Our Appointment With Life: Discourse on Living Happily in the Present Moment is a translation of, and commentary on, the Sutra on Knowing the Better Way to Live Alone by Vietnamese Buddhist teacher Thich Nhat Hanh.

This sutra – or basic text of Buddhist scripture – is the earliest teaching of the Buddha on how to live fully in the present moment.

The ‘better way to live alone’ does not refer to living in solitude and separated from others, but means, as Thich Nhat Hanh says:



…to have sovereignty of yourself, to have freedom, not to be dragged away by the past, not to be in fear of the future, not being pulled around by the circumstances of the present.

The essence of the sutra is contained in a poem, which Thich Nhat Hanh also says captures the essence of all the Buddha’s teachings. It reads:


Do not pursue the past.
Do not lose yourself in the future.
The past no longer is.
The future has not yet come.
Looking deeply at life as it is
in the very here and now,
the practitioner dwells
in stability and freedom.


Living in the here and now is a philosophy that has been greatly popularised. Moreover, the benefits of practising mindfulness have been well researched and documented.

The title that Thich Nhat Hanh gave his commentary, Our Appointment With Life, is an apt one. It’s a useful metaphor. We have an appointment with life, it’s here, and it’s now. We are either early or late. Sometimes, we are very early, when we are stuck in the past. And other times we are very late, thinking about the distant future.

We are all like the Mad Hatter from Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, frantically running around and late for a very important date. Reading Thich Nhat Hanh’s book helped me to put my inner Mad Hatter into perspective, to encourage him to stay still and just take everything in for a moment. And by doing so, I could actually be on time for an appointment.

Awkward Vegan Travel: Turning Down Hospitality

$
0
0

Travelling as a vegan can sometimes present a few challenges. There’s no doubt that in some countries it’s much easier to find vegan food than others. Yet, even if you’re in a small town without a single place that offers something vegan or ‘veganizable’, you shouldn’t have a problem buying fruits, veggies, grains and everything else you need to stay healthy while on the road. (I’m yet to meet a vegan abroad who had to resort to eating only crackers or licking the moss on rocks in order to survive.)

So while I don’t think committing to a vegan diet while travelling has to be an infuriating experience, or even a chore, it can sometimes be a bit awkward. One example is when encountering hospitality; say, if someone invites you into their home and offers you something that is definitely 100% not vegan.

The Kindness of Strangers


A lot of the time when you travel (especially alone or in countries with cultures more welcoming than the one you hail from), one of the greatest experiences is the kindness of strangers. Whether a local invites you to sit with him for lunch or a family invites you into their home for a meal, sharing food is a universal way in which people can connect with each other.

Turning down this kind of hospitality can be considered impolite or cold. But there are many instances when you feel compelled to: maybe you’re sick or have an allergy. Or maybe you’ve decided to avoid animal products for ethical reasons. However, in a culture in which veganism is pretty much an alien concept, avoiding meat, dairy and eggs could be met with confusion, dismay and offence. No one wants to seem like a difficult or ungrateful guest.

If you decided to convert to the green side for health and environmental reasons, then accepting an offer of food, whatever it is, will not be as big a deal compared to if you avoid animal products for ethical reasons. (Having said that, the moral philosopher Peter Singer is a flexible vegan, and doesn’t mind eating animal products if he’s travelling.) If you’ve decided, on principle, to avoid personally participating in, and contributing to, animal exploitation and suffering, then your conscience may force you to reject the kindness of strangers.

Everyone has their own boundaries. For some, they will be vegan at home, but make exceptions abroad for convenience. Others will travel as a vegan too but may make exceptions when food is offered to them. The benefits of cultural exchange and bonding that comes from sharing food will take precedence for some people over an unshakeable commitment to their principles.

How to Turn Down Hospitality Politely 


You may be one of those vegans who just can’t bring themselves to eat a bit of meat, cheese or eggs - you know, someone who stays true to the philosophy as much as they can. It’s not just that the idea is off-putting; but if you can’t ignore the connection between the food and animal suffering, then you just may not be able to justify saying “only this one time.”

So what are you meant to do? Well, if you’re not sure whether what’s on offer is vegan or not, and if there isn’t a language barrier, you could try and ask if the dish has any dairy or eggs in it (if there’s meat, this should be obvious – but maybe ask just in case). You could even be up front and try to explain what veganism is and why you avoid certain foods. Although the cultural barrier may make you seem like a weirdo for refusing to eat something which is so integral to your host’s way of life.

If you don’t want to take the risk and turn a welcoming experience into an uncomfortable one, there are some other ways you can avoid any potential awkwardness. For example, you could say, “I’m not hungry, but thank you.” Or, if vegetarianism is at least understood, then you could say, “I’m vegetarian, but also allergic to dairy and eggs.”

Another excuse I can think of is using the old religion card. After all, if people of faith can say “It’s not kosher/halal” or are vegetarian for religious reasons, then using this as a reason may work. After all, dietary choices based on religious faith seem to go more unquestioned than do dietary choices based on ethical reasons. But if you say “I can’t because of my religion, sorry,” and get asked a bit more about that, well, you better be ready to come up with some religious justification.

Being a vegan in vegan-unfriendly countries is always going to present some challenges – some small, some large. But it’s all a learning experience, as it will teach you how to adapt to different situations in a practical, tactful and respectful way.

The Ethics of Using Smart Drugs to Boost Performance

$
0
0

Using smart drugs to boost performance is not without its ethical issues. While some may claim that it’s cheating to take a substance to outcompete others, others will say that there’s actually a moral imperative to do so in some professions; say, in biomedical research or space exploration, where peak performance can benefit humanity in the long run. It’s a complex issue, no doubt. But it’s worth exploring different perspectives to see what arguments are the most persuasive.


People Will Use Smart Drugs Anyway


The first point that needs making is that people will use smart drugs to improve their performance, regardless of the ethical implications (i.e. whether it puts pressure on students to take a potentially harmful drug or if it’s considered cheating). The use of smart drugs is so popular among students that Oxford University’s Student Union has decided to introduce smart drug workshops.

survey shows that the narcolepsy drug modafinil has been taken by one in four students at Oxford University to enhance performance for revising and exams. It helps students to stay awake for longer and it has been found to improve thinking skills, particularly in complex tasks. Evidence also illustrates that it can help with planning, decision-making, flexibility, learning, memory and creativity.

So it’s no wonder that so many students are taking it, especially when there is the pressure to do the best you possibly can. Even if it means taking a drug for which you haven’t been prescribed.

According to the latest research on modafinil, it seems that the drug is safe in the short-term, with few side-effects and no addictive properties. However, there is also limited information about its long-term effects. Other studies have pointed to modafinil’s potential for abuse. Also, since many students take it in a way which disrupts their sleep, this can have some health implications.

Feeling Pressured to Take a Drug


Some commentators argue that smart drugs are a symptom of our working culture, not a cure for it. Higher education and the workplace can be highly competitive environments. If students know that they can take this drug to perform better, and see many other students who are doing so and who praise its benefits, then the temptation may be too strong for them not to take it themselves.

The same argument applies to performance-enhancing drugs in sports. Even though certain drugs (i.e. anabolic steroids) may be banned, athletes continue to use them, because they know it will give them that edge which can separate the winners from the losers.

A piece published on The Conversation suggests that smart drugs don’t just affect the lives of those who do take them, but also those who do not. If the cognitively enhanced state becomes the new ‘normal’ for employees, then ‘natural’ employees will struggle to keep up with their enhanced peers. But isn’t this already the case with coffee drinkers versus non-coffee drinkers? Or healthy people versus unhealthy people?

Is It Cheating?


Then there’s the question of whether being under the influence of modafinil during an exam is cheating. But again, is this any different from drinking coffee before an exam? Or exercising and eating healthily? Neyer Guerrero, an amateur nootropic researcher, says:

Nootropics are seen as academic steroids, which I think is total bullshit. These aren't pills that will naturally make you smarter. Nootropics [can] help you to an extent, but you still have to do all the work.

From his point of view, smart drugs should be considered brain health supplements. Although not everyone agrees with him. Nita Farahany, a leading bioethicist, claims that it’s “almost impossible to draw the line that defines what is and isn’t cheating.” Duke University, where Faranahy teaches, states that the use cognitive-enhancing drugs (CEDs) without a prescription is cheating. This was in response to the widespread use of Ritalin and Adderall among students.


Using Smart Drugs to Save Lives


There are some professions where taking a smart drug may actually benefit the lives of others. Barabara Sahakian, Professor of Clinical Neuropsychology at the University of Cambridge, said:

If long-term safety and efficacy are proven in healthy people, it may well be, at least for certain segments of the population, these drugs will prove life-savers.

For example, a study published in the journal Annals of Surgery demonstrated that sleep-deprived doctors taking modafinil had cognitive improvements, including flexibility of thinking and reduced impulsivity. Given these findings, it is possible that doctors who take these drugs may be able to plan an intervention more effectively or show greater cognitive flexibility when approaching a challenging clinical problem.

If anything, the latest evidence about smart drugs and the increased interest in using them to boost performance raises more questions than it does provide answers to the debate surrounding their use. There are many pressing issues to be solved right now, such as creating sustainable agriculture and finding cures for tropical diseases. If drugs can be used to reliably help us find solutions quicker (and we do need solutions quickly, given the scale of these issues) then, at least in this respect, the use of smart drugs can be easily justified. 

Sigmund Freud’s Perspective on the Mystical Experience

Animals May Experience Pain More Intensely Than Humans Do

Seneca’s Musings on Life and Time Can Help You Beat Procrastination

The Problem With Being Obsessed About Travel

$
0
0

The Problem With Being Obsessed About Travel

I’ve written before about how travelling can be addictive. I’ve also defended the millennial obsession with travelling. Obviously, it’s better to be ‘addicted’ to travelling than, say, gambling. But if the urge to just ‘travel more’ and hoard… View Post

The post The Problem With Being Obsessed About Travel appeared first on Sam Woolfe.

Viewing all 160 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images